As I told you in a previous post, for months, Google has been pestering me with notices that there was something wrong with the privacy policy of my blog and that if I wouldn't fix it, they would start doing dark and dire things, such as making my blog invisible to search engines. Now, after many attempts and much struggle, I can tell you that the saga is over. So, I am posting these notes that may be useful for you in case you find yourself in the same situation.
The problem had to do with the privacy regulations of the EU and the EEA, aka the "General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): I had to obtain consent from the user for something not explicitly described in the ominous messages I was receiving. Fixing the problem turned out to be a small Odyssey.
6. It means that there has to be a widget for the cookie banner, right? Yes, there is such a widget that you can set as showing a cookie banner as you like it to be. The problems are that 1) it cannot show the banner at top of the page, where these banners normally are, and 2) it doesn't replace the Google-generated banner. So, the result is that you have two different banners in different areas of the screen at the same time. Apart from the awful effect on the way your blog looks, it is not surprising that Google was still not happy with this solution
Sixth lesson learned: Some solutions are not.
7. How about trying chatGPT? Eventually, chatGPT gave me the right hint. It said that it was possible to insert a cookie banner script in the main HTML page of the blog. I tried the scripts provided by chatGPT and none worked, but those provided by helpful human bloggers did. I found that scripts (unlike widgets) can supersede the Google-created banner. After some tweaking, Google was finally happy.
Seventh Lesson learned. ChatGPT is your friend, but it is a bad programmer
________________________________________________
Conclusion.
The good thing about this story is that I learned something, but it was also a sobering experience. The way Google managed it was so bad that I can only understand it as an explicit attempt to discourage small bloggers who are not making money from their blogs and who can't afford a professional maintenance service. Just why harass poor bloggers to do something that Google could do easily on a banner that it is wholly managed by Google? I mean, do you realize the time lost to do such a simple thing as adding a single sentence to a banner?
It seems clear to me that at Google they don't like blogs in general. Even though they offer a blogging platform, it is a poor service for several reasons. Yet, Blogger also has several good points, the main one being that it is free. Then, it offers you possibilities of customization that other "bare-bones" platforms (e.g. substack) do not provide. For someone who just wants to express his/her ideas in public, it can still be a good choice. But, after this experience, I am wary. Google knows what they have in mind next in Mountain View. So, I may switch platforms in the near future. For now, "The Seneca Effect" blog is still there, alive and reasonably well, even though shadow-banned by the Powers That Be. And maybe these notes could be useful for you.
Final lesson I learned: I, for one, welcome our new Google masters
_________________________________________________________
Here is the script to control the text of the cookie consent banner to be cut and pasted into the HTML code of a blogger blog after the </head> tag. It is simple, but it wasn't so simple to understand what was needed.
<script type='text/javascript'>
cookieOptions = {
msg: "This site uses cookies for ad personalization, to analyse traffic and to deliver some Google services. By using this site, you agree to its use of cookies.",
link: "https://www.senecaeffect.com/p/privacy-policy-for-seneca-effect-blog.html",
close: "Okay!",
learn: "Learn More" };
</script>
This is what is known in the business as Yak Shaving - https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=yak+shaving
ReplyDeleteCongratulations, Ugo, now you know what it's like to be a professional programmer.
New Map of Future Oil Production
ReplyDeleteIraq can never stand behind AI that long - producing oil this far in the future, though...
The country doesn't have hard metal deposits, coal, industrial base, water and the rest...
Bringing all these from far away into Iraq - will consume energy unfathomably more than all what oil can be produced in Iraq...
This is no matter how much oil in Iraq remains in the underground....
Therefore, AI will shrink and shrink in covering the globe - until ends up - just a knife, a stick or a bare hand left with an oil well-guard - in Iraq...
An oil well-guard - guarding memories of the past going into an oil-free future - no AI...
The little remaining oil in Iraq needs to be left alone, however, and left alone - now...
...alone - instead of falsefully turning Iraq today into a chaotic, synthetic little China or a victim of another civil and other wars - destroying all the oil left in it - like no tomorrow...
Let the little oil left in Iraq managed not by AI, ChatGPT or our Western Civilisation- but rather only by Wise Counsel...
A Wise Counsel that the less oil it approves out - the wiser it proves
A trial on how the future will look like - without oil - while little oil still around...
Relieve Iraq from the UN, Security Council, OPEC, the US, the West, China, what's called Silk Road', hydro dams and others - leave it simple, energy-conscious, war free - back to its nature, function and wisdom...
In any system of energy, Control is what consumes energy the most.
No energy store holds enough energy to extract an amount of energy equal to the total energy it stores.
No system of energy can deliver sum useful energy in excess of the total energy put into constructing it.
This universal truth applies to all systems.
Energy, like time, flows from past to future.
Wailing.